Posts
This has been a busy summer and have not had time to post. The 2009 Indian Market was a huge success in Santa Fe and business has ticked up a bit. I am keeping busy with more buyers and several really nice listings. Still swamped with real estate work, but thought I would share some more positive news in my industry from this recent article:Positive Signs: Home Prices on an Upswing in Second Quarter 2009Read more:
RISMEDIA, August 26, 2009-Data through June 2009, released by Standard & Poor’s for its S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price Indices, the leading measure of U.S. home prices, show that the U.S. National Home Price Index improved in the second quarter of 2009. The S&P/Case-Shiller U.S. National Home Price Index- which covers all nine U.S. census divisions- recorded a 14.9% decline in the 2nd quarter of 2009 versus the 2nd quarter of 2008. While still a substantial negative annual rate of return, this is an improvement over the record decline of 19.1% reported in the 1st quarter of the year. The 10-City and 20-City Composites recorded annual declines of 15.1% and 15.4%, respectively. These are also improvements from their recent respective record losses of -19.4% and -19.1%.
“For the second month in a row, we’re seeing some positive signs,” says David M. Blitzer, Chairman of the Index Committee at Standard & Poor’s. “The U.S. National Composite rose in the 2nd quarter compared to the 1st quarter of 2009. This is the first time we have seen a positive quarter-over-quarter print in three years. Both the 10-City and 20-City Composites posted monthly increases, as did most of the cities. As seen in both seasonally adjusted and unadjusted data, there are hints of an upward turn from a bottom. However, some of the hardest hit cities, especially in the Sun Belt, show continued weakness.”
As of the 2nd quarter of 2009, average home prices across the United States are at similar levels to what they were in early 2003. From the peak in the second quarter of 2006, average home prices are down 30.2%.
The 10-City and 20-City Composites posted their second consecutive monthly increases. Both indices were up 1.4% in June over May, and up 0.5% in May over April. Eighteen of the 20 metro areas saw improvement in their annual returns compared to those of May. Looking at the monthly data, the same 18 metro areas reported positive returns in June.
In spite of the recent positive data, the overall numbers remain weak, with all metro areas and the two composites posting negative annual returns, and 15 out of the 20 metro areas reporting double digit annual declines. While not alone, Las Vegas and Detroit continue to be two markets that are struggling severely. These are the only two markets that fell in June and saw deterioration in their annual rates of return. Since their relative peaks they have fallen 54.3% and 45.3%, respectively.
More upbeat news is seen in the monthly data across other markets; Dallas and Denver have reported four consecutive months of positive returns. In addition to the two composites, 13 of the MSAs reported positive monthly returns for June that were greater than +1.0%.
The table below summarizes the results for June 2009. The S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price Indices are revised for the 24 prior months, based on the receipt of additional source data.
“For the second month in a row, we’re seeing some positive signs,” says David M. Blitzer, Chairman of the Index Committee at Standard & Poor’s. “The U.S. National Composite rose in the 2nd quarter compared to the 1st quarter of 2009. This is the first time we have seen a positive quarter-over-quarter print in three years. Both the 10-City and 20-City Composites posted monthly increases, as did most of the cities. As seen in both seasonally adjusted and unadjusted data, there are hints of an upward turn from a bottom. However, some of the hardest hit cities, especially in the Sun Belt, show continued weakness.”
As of the 2nd quarter of 2009, average home prices across the United States are at similar levels to what they were in early 2003. From the peak in the second quarter of 2006, average home prices are down 30.2%.
The 10-City and 20-City Composites posted their second consecutive monthly increases. Both indices were up 1.4% in June over May, and up 0.5% in May over April. Eighteen of the 20 metro areas saw improvement in their annual returns compared to those of May. Looking at the monthly data, the same 18 metro areas reported positive returns in June.
In spite of the recent positive data, the overall numbers remain weak, with all metro areas and the two composites posting negative annual returns, and 15 out of the 20 metro areas reporting double digit annual declines. While not alone, Las Vegas and Detroit continue to be two markets that are struggling severely. These are the only two markets that fell in June and saw deterioration in their annual rates of return. Since their relative peaks they have fallen 54.3% and 45.3%, respectively.
More upbeat news is seen in the monthly data across other markets; Dallas and Denver have reported four consecutive months of positive returns. In addition to the two composites, 13 of the MSAs reported positive monthly returns for June that were greater than +1.0%.
The table below summarizes the results for June 2009. The S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price Indices are revised for the 24 prior months, based on the receipt of additional source data.
2009 Q2 2009 Q2/2009 Q1 2009 Q1/2008 Q4 1-Year
Level Change (%) Change (%) Change (%)
U.S. National
Index 132.64 2.9% -7.4% -14.9%
June 2009 June/May May/April 1-Year
Metropolitan Level Change (%) Change (%) Change (%)
Area
Atlanta 107.52 1.5% 0.5% -13.7%
Boston 152.71 2.6% 1.6% -5.9%
Charlotte 120.66 0.7% 0.9% -9.6%
Chicago 124.99 1.1% 1.1% -16.7%
Cleveland 106.38 4.2% 4.1% -3.0%
Dallas 119.68 2.7% 1.9% -2.2%
Denver 126.92 2.5% 1.3% -3.6%
Detroit 69.49 -0.8% 0.2% -25.0%
Las Vegas 107.31 -2.0% -2.6% -32.4%
Los Angeles 160.90 1.1% -0.1% -17.8%
Miami 145.37 0.5% -0.8% -23.4%
Minneapolis 113.48 3.1% 1.1% -19.8%
New York 171.49 0.4% 0.2% -11.9%
Phoenix 104.73 1.1% -0.9% -31.6%
Portland 148.47 1.0% 0.1% -15.2%
San Diego 147.31 1.6% 0.4% -16.0%
San Francisco 124.70 3.8% 1.4% -22.0%
Seattle 149.53 0.4% -0.3% -16.1%
Tampa 140.90 0.4% 0.0% -19.5%
Washington 174.32 2.8% 1.3% -11.8%
Composite-10 153.20 1.4% 0.5% -15.1%Composite-20 141.86 1.4% 0.5% -15.4%
For more information, visit http://www.standardandpoors.com/.
No comments:
Post a Comment